top of page

How is the proposed Humboldt offshore wind project different from offshore wind projects on the East Coast?

All of the currently installed offshore wind turbines (1) off the East Coast of the U.S. are fixed-bottom turbines, while the proposed Humboldt offshore wind project would use floating turbines. Compared to floating turbines, fixed-bottom turbines cause different environmental impacts, due to the construction of their foundations in shallow water at sea and their proximity to the shore (11.7 miles on average) (2).

Illustration of most common types of fixed-bottom offshore wind turbines: gravity base, monopile, tripod, jacket, and suction bucket jacket.

Most common types of fixed-bottom offshore wind turbines.

Source: Ghost456 via Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0) (3)

In contrast, floating offshore wind turbines are constructed onshore and then tugged out to sea, where they operate considerably farther from shore (21–29 miles for the Humboldt Wind Energy Area [4]) in much deeper water than fixed-bottom turbines. Floating offshore wind turbines are tethered to the seafloor using anchors and mooring lines, which are projected to have fewer impacts on wildlife and the environment (5) than the concrete or steel platforms of onshore and near-shore turbines. Because of their distance away from the coast, they would also be far less visible from land than near-shore wind turbines while at sea. At the same time, floating offshore wind turbines would need to be constructed in port and would therefore be quite visible at those times.

Visualization of 3 types of floating offshore wind turbines: spar-buoy, semi-submersible, and tension leg platform.

Types of floating offshore wind turbines.

Source: California Energy Commission (6)

References

  1. Wikipedia Contributors. (2024, May 23). List of offshore wind farms. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_offshore_wind_farms

  2. Díaz, H. & Guedes Soares, C. (2020). Review of the current status, technology and future trends of offshore wind farms. Ocean Engineering, 209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107381

  3. Ghost456. (2022, April 8). Most common types of fixed offshore wind foundations [Image]. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Offshore_wind_power#/media/File:Offshore_wind_foundation_types.svg 

  4. U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. (n.d.). Humboldt Wind Energy Area. www.boem.gov/renewable-energy/state-activities/humboldt-wind-energy-area

  5. U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Office of Renewable Energy Programs. (2021). Comparison of Environmental Effects from Different Offshore Wind Turbine Foundations. U.S. Department of the Interior. www.boem.gov/sites/default/files/documents/environment/Comparison-Environmental-Effects-Different-OWT-Foundations-2021.pdf 

  6. California Energy Commission. (2024). AB 525 Reports: Offshore Renewable Energy. www.energy.ca.gov/data-reports/reports/ab-525-reports-offshore-renewable-energy 

  7. DW Planet A. (2023, March 17). Floating wind turbines: Offshore energy's secret weapon [Video]. YouTube. www.youtube.com/watch?v=El4kHkJ7ITs

  8. Principle Power. (2020, May 14). RTE - 10 Things You Need to Know - WindFloat Atlantic [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2VpFPlp82o

  9. Fluctus. (2023, Feb 21). The Fascinating Process of Installing Billions $ Wind Farms in Middle of the Ocean [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mpqy0Tpt5p0

© 2024 Environmental Protection Information Center / Humboldt Waterkeeper / Redwood CORE Hub / Blue Lake Rancheria.

Powered and secured by Wix.

bottom of page